Competitor profile

Kadar Associates

They win 57% of what they bid, but only 31% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

7tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
24 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
7
7 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹87.8 L
of ₹2.9 Cr bid — 30.7% conversion
Win rate
57.1%
of 7 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count7 bids
57.1%
14.3%
28.6%
Awarded457.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected114.3%
Lost228.6%
By value₹2.9 Cr
30.7%
54.3%
15.0%
Awarded₹87.8 L30.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.5 Cr54.3%
Lost₹42.8 L15.0%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

MAWS₹32.8 L37.4%

Operating states

LowHigh
Tamil Nadu₹87.8 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Sivasakthi Construction0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
02
R. THIRUMALAI GURUSAMY0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
SREE HARI TRADERS1 win · 1 shared tender
₹1.3 Cr
won head-to-head
04
Saravanaguru Construction0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Gunasekaran G0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
MAHENDRAN S0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKadar Associates awardedOthers

About Kadar Associates

Kadar Associates appears as a bidder on 7 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 7 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 57.1% win rate — worth ₹87.8 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 24 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Tamilnadu Forest Department, at 62.6% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Tamil Nadu. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Sivasakthi Construction, R. THIRUMALAI GURUSAMY and SREE HARI TRADERS. Sivasakthi Construction bid on 1 of the same tender and won 0 of them; Kadar Associates won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.