Competitor profile

K.Sivakumar

They win 57% of what they bid, but only 46% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

49tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
28 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
49
49 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
28
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.2 Cr
of ₹2.6 Cr bid — 45.8% conversion
Win rate
57.1%
of 49 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count49 bids
57.1%
42.9%
Awarded2857.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected2142.9%
Lost00.0%
By value₹2.6 Cr
45.8%
54.2%
Awarded₹1.2 Cr45.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.4 Cr54.2%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

MAWS₹10,0010.1%

Operating states

LowHigh
Tamil Nadu₹1.2 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
MANO CONSTRUCTIONS19 wins · 46 shared tenders
₹1.3 Cr
won head-to-head
02
RAJESH2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹6.8 L
won head-to-head
03
SHAHUL AMEEDU0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
MOHAMAD YASIK0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
AFRIDHEEN0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
JAFARSATHIK1 win · 1 shared tender
₹10,600
won head-to-head
Rival awardedK.Sivakumar awardedOthers

About K.Sivakumar

K.Sivakumar appears as a bidder on 49 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 49 decided bids, it was awarded 28 — a 57.1% win rate — worth ₹1.2 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 28 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, at 99.9% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Tamil Nadu. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against MANO CONSTRUCTIONS, RAJESH and SHAHUL AMEEDU. MANO CONSTRUCTIONS bid on 46 of the same tenders and won 19 of them; K.Sivakumar won 27.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.