Competitor profile

K M Engineering and Construction

They win 22% of what they bid — and 37% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

58tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
4 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
41
58 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
9
25 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹91.0 Cr
of ₹248.1 Cr bid — 36.7% conversion
Win rate
21.9%
of 41 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count41 bids
22.0%
17.1%
61.0%
Awarded922.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected717.1%
Lost2561.0%
By value₹248.1 Cr
36.7%
60.8%
Awarded₹91.0 Cr36.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹6.2 Cr2.5%
Lost₹150.9 Cr60.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

9 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
G. S. Matiyani And Sons3 wins · 23 shared tenders
₹12.4 Cr
won head-to-head
02
mrs panch ghaticonstruction1 win · 15 shared tenders
₹4.3 Cr
won head-to-head
03
GDS INFRASTRUCTURE1 win · 14 shared tenders
₹8.4 Cr
won head-to-head
04
M/S DALIP SINGH ADHIKARI2 wins · 13 shared tenders
₹19.3 Cr
won head-to-head
05
GANGA PRASAD PUNETHA1 win · 12 shared tenders
₹5.4 Cr
won head-to-head
06
Dinesh Chandra Patni1 win · 11 shared tenders
₹12.4 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedK M Engineering awardedOthers

About K M Engineering and Construction

K M Engineering and Construction appears as a bidder on 58 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 41 decided bids, it was awarded 9 — a 21.9% win rate — worth ₹91.0 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 4 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Chief Coordinator, PMGSY, Uttarkhand, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.7% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against G. S. Matiyani And Sons, mrs panch ghaticonstruction and GDS INFRASTRUCTURE. G. S. Matiyani And Sons bid on 23 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; K M Engineering and Construction won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.