Competitor profile

K M Engineering and Construction

They win 9% of what they bid, and 6% of the value they chase.

22tenders on record
5buyer authorities
1state
20 Apr 2026last award
Total bids
22
22 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
6 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.9 Cr
of ₹49.8 Cr bid — 5.7% conversion
Win rate
9.1%
of 22 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count22 bids
63.6%
27.3%
Awarded29.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected1463.6%
Lost627.3%
By value₹49.8 Cr
65.1%
29.2%
Awarded₹2.9 Cr5.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹32.4 Cr65.1%
Lost₹14.5 Cr29.2%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttarakhand₹2.9 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
G. S. Matiyani And Sons2 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹9.1 Cr
won head-to-head
02
BISHT CONSTRUCITON1 win · 6 shared tenders
₹1.1 Cr
won head-to-head
03
BHAGWAN SINGH DEOPA1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹1.4 Cr
won head-to-head
04
RAVINDRA SINGH LUNTHI0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Ravindra Singh Deopa1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹1.2 Cr
won head-to-head
06
Mohan singh0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedK M Engineering awardedOthers

About K M Engineering and Construction

K M Engineering and Construction appears as a bidder on 22 government tenders on record, from 5 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 22 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 9.1% win rate — worth ₹2.9 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 20 Apr 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is MD Uttarakhand Agriculture Produce Marketing Board Rudrapur, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Uttarakhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against G. S. Matiyani And Sons, BISHT CONSTRUCITON and BHAGWAN SINGH DEOPA. G. S. Matiyani And Sons bid on 7 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; K M Engineering and Construction won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.