Competitor profile

K L Traders

They win 55% of what they bid, and 63% of the value they chase.

31tenders on record
7buyer authorities
1state
30 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
31
31 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
17
7 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.4 Cr
of ₹2.2 Cr bid — 63.0% conversion
Win rate
54.8%
of 31 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count31 bids
54.8%
22.6%
22.6%
Awarded1754.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected722.6%
Lost722.6%
By value₹2.2 Cr
63.0%
16.5%
20.5%
Awarded₹1.4 Cr63.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹36.8 L16.5%
Lost₹45.6 L20.5%

Where they win

5 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Vardhaman Enterprises6 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹22.6 L
won head-to-head
02
Jain Home Industries7 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹84.9 L
won head-to-head
03
NAMOKAR TRADERS8 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹35.4 L
won head-to-head
04
ALL INDIA TECHNO TOOLS0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
SINGHAL KIRANA STORES2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹4.3 L
won head-to-head
06
Bhagwan lalluji modi0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedK L Traders awardedOthers

About K L Traders

K L Traders appears as a bidder on 31 government tenders on record, from 7 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 31 decided bids, it was awarded 17 — a 54.8% win rate — worth ₹1.4 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Director General of Prisons and Correctional Services, at 87.2% of what it has won, out of 5 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 89.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Vardhaman Enterprises, Jain Home Industries and NAMOKAR TRADERS. Vardhaman Enterprises bid on 9 of the same tenders and won 6 of them; K L Traders won 6.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.