Competitor profile

M/s Jyoti Constructions

They win 31% of what they bid, and 40% of the value they chase.

62tenders on record
6buyer authorities
1state
7 Apr 2026last award
Total bids
62
62 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
19
16 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹25.6 Cr
of ₹63.5 Cr bid — 40.2% conversion
Win rate
30.6%
of 62 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count62 bids
30.6%
43.5%
25.8%
Awarded1930.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected2743.5%
Lost1625.8%
By value₹63.5 Cr
40.2%
37.4%
22.3%
Awarded₹25.6 Cr40.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹23.8 Cr37.4%
Lost₹14.2 Cr22.3%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

MD- UJVN₹25.4 L1.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttarakhand₹25.6 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
BHARAT SINGH PANWAR4 wins · 27 shared tenders
₹3.7 Cr
won head-to-head
02
MOHAN SINGH5 wins · 21 shared tenders
₹3.5 Cr
won head-to-head
03
M/S JEET SINGH TOMAR6 wins · 19 shared tenders
₹5.6 Cr
won head-to-head
04
Darshan Lal Nautiyal1 win · 12 shared tenders
₹50.2 L
won head-to-head
05
M/S S B K CONTRACTOR3 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹1.5 Cr
won head-to-head
06
M/S NAGENDRA SINGH PUNDIR0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedJyoti Constructions awardedOthers

About M/s Jyoti Constructions

M/s Jyoti Constructions appears as a bidder on 62 government tenders on record, from 6 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 62 decided bids, it was awarded 19 — a 30.6% win rate — worth ₹25.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 7 Apr 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is MD (Drinking Water) Peyjal Nigam GoUK, at 81.7% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Uttarakhand. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against BHARAT SINGH PANWAR, MOHAN SINGH and M/S JEET SINGH TOMAR. BHARAT SINGH PANWAR bid on 27 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; M/s Jyoti Constructions won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.