Competitor profile

JUNAID ATEEK

They win 55% of what they bid, but only 45% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

15tenders on record
5buyer authorities
0states
30 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
11
15 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
6
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹59.4 L
of ₹1.3 Cr bid — 44.5% conversion
Win rate
54.5%
of 11 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count11 bids
54.5%
36.4%
Awarded654.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected19.1%
Lost436.4%
By value₹1.3 Cr
44.5%
47.9%
Awarded₹59.4 L44.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹10.1 L7.6%
Lost₹63.8 L47.9%

Where they win

4 authorities · 0 states

Operating states

LowHigh

6 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Komere Manoj Kumar1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹8.9 L
won head-to-head
02
Irfan Ahmad1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹10.1 L
won head-to-head
03
DUROLAC0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Sabur Alam0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
YOGESH KUMAR AND CO0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Sri Venkateshwara Enterprises0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedJUNAID ATEEK awardedOthers

About JUNAID ATEEK

JUNAID ATEEK appears as a bidder on 15 government tenders on record, from 5 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 11 decided bids, it was awarded 6 — a 54.5% win rate — worth ₹59.4 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is DG,CRPF,MHA, at 31.9% of what it has won, out of 4 authorities that have awarded it work. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Komere Manoj Kumar, Irfan Ahmad and DUROLAC. Komere Manoj Kumar bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; JUNAID ATEEK won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.