Competitor profile

M/S JOYGURU ENTERPRISE

They win 36% of what they bid, and 35% of the value they chase.

76tenders on record
8buyer authorities
1state
16 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
76
76 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
27
48 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹82.0 L
of ₹2.3 Cr bid — 35.2% conversion
Win rate
35.5%
of 76 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count76 bids
35.5%
63.2%
Awarded2735.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected11.3%
Lost4863.2%
By value₹2.3 Cr
35.2%
63.3%
Awarded₹82.0 L35.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹3.5 L1.5%
Lost₹1.5 Cr63.3%

Where they win

4 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Tripura₹82.0 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
NAYAN DEBNATH7 wins · 17 shared tenders
₹14.7 L
won head-to-head
02
M/S JOYRAM ELECTRONICS AND ELECTRICALS3 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹5.3 L
won head-to-head
03
NISHA SINGHA0 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/S A R ELECTRICAL2 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹6.0 L
won head-to-head
05
Paritosh Roy Karmakar1 win · 9 shared tenders
₹97,795
won head-to-head
06
SAYAN DEY1 win · 7 shared tenders
₹1.2 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedJOYGURU ENTERPRISE awardedOthers

About M/S JOYGURU ENTERPRISE

M/S JOYGURU ENTERPRISE appears as a bidder on 76 government tenders on record, from 8 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 76 decided bids, it was awarded 27 — a 35.5% win rate — worth ₹82.0 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 16 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Chief Engineer, PWD (R and B), at 57.5% of what it has won, out of 4 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Tripura. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against NAYAN DEBNATH, M/S JOYRAM ELECTRONICS AND ELECTRICALS and NISHA SINGHA. NAYAN DEBNATH bid on 17 of the same tenders and won 7 of them; M/S JOYGURU ENTERPRISE won 5.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.