Competitor profile

JOSMAR CONSULTING ENGINEERS

They win 50% of what they bid — and 62% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

6tenders on record
2buyer authorities
0states
8 May 2026last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹11.4 L
of ₹18.3 L bid — 62.4% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count6 bids
50.0%
16.7%
33.3%
Awarded350.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected116.7%
Lost233.3%
By value₹18.3 L
62.4%
37.6%
Awarded₹11.4 L62.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹6.9 L37.6%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

3 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
₹1.4 L
won head-to-head
02
GALLOP INFRA SERVICES CONSULTANCY1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹4.8 L
won head-to-head
03
Bridge Craft Engineers And Consultants0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Garud Survey Private Limited0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
PARSAN OVERSEAS PVT LTD1 win · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
MNEC Consultants Pvt. Ltd1 win · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedJOSMAR CONSULTING awardedOthers

About JOSMAR CONSULTING ENGINEERS

JOSMAR CONSULTING ENGINEERS appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹11.4 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 8 May 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Central Warehousing Corporation, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against AKM INFRASTRUCTURE AND DESIGN SOLUTIONS, GALLOP INFRA SERVICES CONSULTANCY and Bridge Craft Engineers And Consultants. AKM INFRASTRUCTURE AND DESIGN SOLUTIONS bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; JOSMAR CONSULTING ENGINEERS won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.