Competitor profile

M/S JAI KUMAR MAHTO

They win 11% of what they bid, and 3% of the value they chase.

9tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
18 Mar 2025last award
Total bids
9
9 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
6 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹6.2 L
of ₹2.4 Cr bid — 2.6% conversion
Win rate
11.1%
of 9 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count9 bids
11.1%
22.2%
66.7%
Awarded111.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected222.2%
Lost666.7%
By value₹2.4 Cr
36.7%
60.7%
Awarded₹6.2 L2.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹89.0 L36.7%
Lost₹1.5 Cr60.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
AKHILESH KUMAR SINGH3 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹27.3 L
won head-to-head
02
KULDIP SAW1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹29.5 L
won head-to-head
03
M/S MAA CONSTRUCTION & BUILDERS1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹26.7 L
won head-to-head
04
FLY HIGH INFRASTRUCTURE0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
MANGRU ORAON1 win · 1 shared tender
₹31.5 L
won head-to-head
06
ATTA CONSTRUCTIONS COMPANY0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedJAI KUMAR MAHTO awardedOthers

About M/S JAI KUMAR MAHTO

M/S JAI KUMAR MAHTO appears as a bidder on 9 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 9 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 11.1% win rate — worth ₹6.2 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 18 Mar 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Central Coalfields Limited, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against AKHILESH KUMAR SINGH, KULDIP SAW and M/S MAA CONSTRUCTION & BUILDERS. AKHILESH KUMAR SINGH bid on 7 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; M/S JAI KUMAR MAHTO won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.