Competitor profile

M/S JAI DURGE CONSTRUCTION

They win 33% of what they bid, but only 13% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

6tenders on record
3buyer authorities
0states
10 Oct 2025last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹7.8 Cr
of ₹60.7 Cr bid — 12.8% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count6 bids
33.3%
33.3%
33.3%
Awarded233.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected233.3%
Lost233.3%
By value₹60.7 Cr
12.8%
45.5%
41.7%
Awarded₹7.8 Cr12.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹27.6 Cr45.5%
Lost₹25.3 Cr41.7%

Where they win

2 authorities · 0 states

Operating states

LowHigh

2 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
C P & Associates Pvt Ltd1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹12.9 Cr
won head-to-head
02
Sh Pawan Kumar0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Vaibhav Construction0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
₹0
won head-to-head
05
ANAYA INFRACON PRIVATE LIMITED0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
G and G INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedJAI DURGE CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

About M/S JAI DURGE CONSTRUCTION

M/S JAI DURGE CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹7.8 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 10 Oct 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is National Capital Region Transport Corporation, at 93.6% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. On priced bids, its median quote is 7.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against C P & Associates Pvt Ltd, Sh Pawan Kumar and Vaibhav Construction. C P & Associates Pvt Ltd bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; M/S JAI DURGE CONSTRUCTION won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.