Competitor profile

JAGRATAN SAHU

They win 22% of what they bid, and 23% of the value they chase.

24tenders on record
5buyer authorities
1state
11 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
23
24 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
13 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.6 Cr
of ₹11.6 Cr bid — 22.8% conversion
Win rate
21.7%
of 23 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count23 bids
21.7%
21.7%
56.5%
Awarded521.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected521.7%
Lost1356.5%
By value₹11.6 Cr
22.8%
24.3%
53.0%
Awarded₹2.6 Cr22.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.8 Cr24.3%
Lost₹6.2 Cr53.0%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

GUMLA ZILA PARISHAD₹1.7 Cr62.8%

Operating states

LowHigh
Jharkhand₹2.6 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S SUBHAM CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
M/s Sarveshwari Construction0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
KAUSHAL CONSTRUCTION1 win · 6 shared tenders
₹54.7 L
won head-to-head
04
AMRITA KUMARI2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹1.2 Cr
won head-to-head
05
M/S SHALINI DEVI1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹80.8 L
won head-to-head
06
MAHESHWAR SAHU1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹52.7 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedJAGRATAN SAHU awardedOthers

About JAGRATAN SAHU

JAGRATAN SAHU appears as a bidder on 24 government tenders on record, from 5 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 23 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 21.7% win rate — worth ₹2.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 11 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is GUMLA ZILA PARISHAD, at 62.8% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Jharkhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 4.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S SUBHAM CONSTRUCTION, M/s Sarveshwari Construction and KAUSHAL CONSTRUCTION. M/S SUBHAM CONSTRUCTION bid on 7 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; JAGRATAN SAHU won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.