Competitor profile

M/S J S ENGINEERS

They win 7% of what they bid, and 5% of the value they chase.

50tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
1 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
46
50 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
42 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹76.2 L
of ₹14.9 Cr bid — 5.1% conversion
Win rate
6.5%
of 46 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count46 bids
91.3%
Awarded36.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected12.2%
Lost4291.3%
By value₹14.9 Cr
92.0%
Awarded₹76.2 L5.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹43.4 L2.9%
Lost₹13.7 Cr92.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

3 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Nitika electricals and engineers works3 wins · 18 shared tenders
₹74.6 L
won head-to-head
02
BMMJ TRADERS AND ENGINEERS3 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹82.5 L
won head-to-head
03
M/S ANMOL TRADING CO3 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹1.1 Cr
won head-to-head
04
M/S KALSI ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS2 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹78.2 L
won head-to-head
05
Allied Technologies2 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹59.9 L
won head-to-head
06
HARSH ELECTRICAL STORE3 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹72.7 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedJ S ENGINEERS awardedOthers

About M/S J S ENGINEERS

M/S J S ENGINEERS appears as a bidder on 50 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 46 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 6.5% win rate — worth ₹76.2 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 23.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Nitika electricals and engineers works, BMMJ TRADERS AND ENGINEERS and M/S ANMOL TRADING CO. Nitika electricals and engineers works bid on 18 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; M/S J S ENGINEERS won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.