Competitor profile

International Print o Pac Limited

They win 77% of what they bid — and 88% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

13tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
26 Nov 2021last award
Total bids
13
13 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
10
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹27.9 Cr
of ₹31.8 Cr bid — 87.7% conversion
Win rate
76.9%
of 13 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count13 bids
76.9%
23.1%
Awarded1076.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost323.1%
By value₹31.8 Cr
87.7%
12.3%
Awarded₹27.9 Cr87.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹3.9 Cr12.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

RCDF- MD₹27.9 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Rajasthan₹27.9 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
NISHA ENTERPRISES4 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹9.0 Cr
won head-to-head
02
Miracle Print Pack Private Limited5 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹7.1 Cr
won head-to-head
03
AMM AAR PACKS1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹2.7 Cr
won head-to-head
04
DIMPLE PACKAGING PVT. LTD.0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Graphik Pak1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹1.8 Cr
won head-to-head
06
CAMBAY TECHNOPACK PVT. LTD.2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹6.6 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedInternational awardedOthers

About International Print o Pac Limited

International Print o Pac Limited appears as a bidder on 13 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 13 decided bids, it was awarded 10 — a 76.9% win rate — worth ₹27.9 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 26 Nov 2021.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is RCDF- MD, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Rajasthan. On priced bids, its median quote is 28.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against NISHA ENTERPRISES, Miracle Print Pack Private Limited and AMM AAR PACKS. NISHA ENTERPRISES bid on 10 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; International Print o Pac Limited won 8.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.