Competitor profile

M/S INFOCUS TECHNOLOGIES

They win 17% of what they bid, and 21% of the value they chase.

6tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
18 Dec 2025last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹36.4 L
of ₹1.7 Cr bid — 21.2% conversion
Win rate
16.7%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count6 bids
16.7%
16.7%
66.7%
Awarded116.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected116.7%
Lost466.7%
By value₹1.7 Cr
21.2%
74.9%
Awarded₹36.4 L21.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹6.7 L3.9%
Lost₹1.3 Cr74.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
COMPUTER GALAXY2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹64.4 L
won head-to-head
02
FMSOFT PRIVATE LIMITED1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹35.2 L
won head-to-head
03
E-LIBRARY SERVICES0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/S JAY DEE ENTERPRISES0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
VIRAJ GLOBAL0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/S T N S ASSOCIATES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedINFOCUS TECHNOLOGIES awardedOthers

About M/S INFOCUS TECHNOLOGIES

M/S INFOCUS TECHNOLOGIES appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 16.7% win rate — worth ₹36.4 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 18 Dec 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Jammu And Kashmir. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against COMPUTER GALAXY, FMSOFT PRIVATE LIMITED and E-LIBRARY SERVICES. COMPUTER GALAXY bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; M/S INFOCUS TECHNOLOGIES won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.