Competitor profile

Himalaya Traders

They win 30% of what they bid, and 32% of the value they chase.

54tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
5 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
54
54 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
16
38 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹188.3 Cr
of ₹582.6 Cr bid — 32.3% conversion
Win rate
29.6%
of 54 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count54 bids
29.6%
70.4%
Awarded1629.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost3870.4%
By value₹582.6 Cr
32.3%
67.7%
Awarded₹188.3 Cr32.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹394.3 Cr67.7%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Excise Department₹187.0 Cr99.3%

Operating states

LowHigh
Madhya Pradesh₹188.3 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
VINOD SHIVHARE2 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹12.6 Cr
won head-to-head
02
Shree Jagdamba Liquors1 win · 6 shared tenders
₹4.3 Cr
won head-to-head
03
BHAIYA LAL SHIVHARE1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹1.6 Cr
won head-to-head
04
MSVP TRADING COMPANY3 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹11.3 Cr
won head-to-head
05
VIPIN KUMAR RAI0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
prayansu rai2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹16.1 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedHimalaya Traders awardedOthers

About Himalaya Traders

Himalaya Traders appears as a bidder on 54 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 54 decided bids, it was awarded 16 — a 29.6% win rate — worth ₹188.3 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 5 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Excise Department, at 99.3% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against VINOD SHIVHARE, Shree Jagdamba Liquors and BHAIYA LAL SHIVHARE. VINOD SHIVHARE bid on 7 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; Himalaya Traders won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.