Competitor profile

HASTI MAL OSWAL -M/S PAR INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD

They win 17% of what they bid, and 17% of the value they chase.

6tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
24 Feb 2015last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.6 Cr
of ₹21.5 Cr bid — 16.6% conversion
Win rate
16.7%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count6 bids
16.7%
50.0%
33.3%
Awarded116.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected350.0%
Lost233.3%
By value₹21.5 Cr
16.6%
49.9%
33.5%
Awarded₹3.6 Cr16.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹10.8 Cr49.9%
Lost₹7.2 Cr33.5%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Rajasthan₹3.6 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
DURGA SINGH KHICHI-M/S P.S. BUILDERS2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹7.2 Cr
won head-to-head
02
₹0
won head-to-head
03
GAJENDRA SINGH SANKHLA1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹3.6 Cr
won head-to-head
04
₹7.1 Cr
won head-to-head
05
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedHASTI MAL OSWAL awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to HASTI MAL OSWAL

About HASTI MAL OSWAL -M/S PAR INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD

HASTI MAL OSWAL -M/S PAR INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 16.7% win rate — worth ₹3.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 24 Feb 2015.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Rajasthan Housing Board - CE, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Rajasthan. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against DURGA SINGH KHICHI-M/S P.S. BUILDERS, Amit Kumar Vijayvergiya-ACL Infratech Pvt Ltd and GAJENDRA SINGH SANKHLA. DURGA SINGH KHICHI-M/S P.S. BUILDERS bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; HASTI MAL OSWAL -M/S PAR INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.