Competitor profile

M/s Harsh Construction

They win 31% of what they bid, and 27% of the value they chase.

16tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
25 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
16
16 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
10 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹55.2 L
of ₹2.1 Cr bid — 26.8% conversion
Win rate
31.3%
of 16 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count16 bids
31.3%
62.5%
Awarded531.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected16.3%
Lost1062.5%
By value₹2.1 Cr
26.8%
70.8%
Awarded₹55.2 L26.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹4.9 L2.4%
Lost₹1.5 Cr70.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

5 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SAI TRADERS2 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹36.2 L
won head-to-head
02
M/S. NAMDEO KHOJRE CONSTRUCTION2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹24.3 L
won head-to-head
03
DIGIGAON TECHLONOGIES LLP0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
RITA TRADERS0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
B R Hulde0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Shilpkaar Infra And Trading2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹16.6 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedHarsh Construction awardedOthers

About M/s Harsh Construction

M/s Harsh Construction appears as a bidder on 16 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 16 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 31.3% win rate — worth ₹55.2 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 25 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Western Coalfields Limited, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 13.7% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SAI TRADERS, M/S. NAMDEO KHOJRE CONSTRUCTION and DIGIGAON TECHLONOGIES LLP. SAI TRADERS bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; M/s Harsh Construction won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.