Competitor profile

Harpal butola

They win 38% of what they bid — and 78% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

8tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
1 Apr 2019last award
Total bids
8
8 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
5 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹5.6 Cr
of ₹7.3 Cr bid — 77.7% conversion
Win rate
37.5%
of 8 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count8 bids
37.5%
62.5%
Awarded337.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost562.5%
By value₹7.3 Cr
77.7%
22.3%
Awarded₹5.6 Cr77.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹1.6 Cr22.3%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttarakhand₹5.6 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Roopkund F Agency2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹380
won head-to-head
02
₹364
won head-to-head
03
VIRENDRA SINGH NEGI0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
S Kunwar F Agency0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/S Prayag Construction0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
N D Goshwami0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedHarpal butola awardedOthers

About Harpal butola

Harpal butola appears as a bidder on 8 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 8 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 37.5% win rate — worth ₹5.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Apr 2019.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Excise Commissioner Uttarakhand, at 100.0% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Uttarakhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Roopkund F Agency, Chamoli Zila Motor Yatayat Sahakari Samitti Ltd. and VIRENDRA SINGH NEGI. Roopkund F Agency bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; Harpal butola won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.