Competitor profile

HARISH KUMAR NIMBE

They win 50% of what they bid — and 72% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

2tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
15 Dec 2025last award
Total bids
2
2 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹71.5 L
of ₹98.7 L bid — 72.5% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 2 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count2 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded150.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost150.0%
By value₹98.7 L
72.5%
27.5%
Awarded₹71.5 L72.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹27.2 L27.5%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
RAMESH CHANDRA KALURAM KANTHED1 win · 1 shared tender
₹25.0 L
won head-to-head
02
maruti construction0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
HARA CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
DHAKAD AGRO AGENCY0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
SHREE GANESH SUPPLIERS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedHARISH KUMAR awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to HARISH KUMAR

About HARISH KUMAR NIMBE

HARISH KUMAR NIMBE appears as a bidder on 2 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 2 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹71.5 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 15 Dec 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Urban Administration and Development, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 4.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against RAMESH CHANDRA KALURAM KANTHED, maruti construction and HARA CONSTRUCTION. RAMESH CHANDRA KALURAM KANTHED bid on 1 of the same tender and won 1 of them; HARISH KUMAR NIMBE won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.