Competitor profile

harish chandra misra

They win 9% of what they bid, and 6% of the value they chase.

22tenders on record
6buyer authorities
1state
6 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
22
22 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹68.6 L
of ₹10.7 Cr bid — 6.4% conversion
Win rate
9.1%
of 22 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count22 bids
86.4%
Awarded29.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected1986.4%
Lost14.5%
By value₹10.7 Cr
91.5%
Awarded₹68.6 L6.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹9.8 Cr91.5%
Lost₹22.8 L2.1%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

RES - Chief Engineer₹22.3 L32.5%

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttarakhand₹68.6 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
sunil chandra joshi0 wins · 20 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
m/s vijay kishor singh mehta2 wins · 17 shared tenders
₹1.1 Cr
won head-to-head
03
m/s gautam singh mehta0 wins · 16 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
BRIJESH SINGH0 wins · 16 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
umed singh mehra1 win · 12 shared tenders
₹42.0 L
won head-to-head
06
Nath Singh Bohra0 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedharish chandra awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to harish chandra

About harish chandra misra

harish chandra misra appears as a bidder on 22 government tenders on record, from 6 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 22 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 9.1% win rate — worth ₹68.6 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 6 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is CGM (Drinking Water) Jal Sansthan, at 67.5% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Uttarakhand. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against sunil chandra joshi, m/s vijay kishor singh mehta and m/s gautam singh mehta. sunil chandra joshi bid on 20 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; harish chandra misra won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.