Competitor profile

Haleem Bhat-Shalimar Engineering Pvt ltd

They win 33% of what they bid, but only 8% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

3tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
25 Mar 2013last award
Total bids
3
3 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹15.5 L
of ₹2.0 Cr bid — 7.8% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count3 bids
33.3%
66.7%
Awarded133.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost266.7%
By value₹2.0 Cr
92.1%
Awarded₹15.5 L7.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹1.8 Cr92.1%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

DG-PRISONS₹15.5 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Fayaz Ahmad Wani-Engineering Group0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
IMRAN HAKAK-AL HASSAN ASSOCIATES1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹14.3 L
won head-to-head
03
₹0
won head-to-head
04
₹1.6 Cr
won head-to-head
05
Kirshana Veer Singh-MAMTA PRODUCTS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
SIRAJ AHMAD BHAT-SIRAJ AHMAD BHAT0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedHaleem Bhat-Shalimar awardedOthers

About Haleem Bhat-Shalimar Engineering Pvt ltd

Haleem Bhat-Shalimar Engineering Pvt ltd appears as a bidder on 3 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹15.5 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 25 Mar 2013.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is DG-PRISONS, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Jammu And Kashmir. On priced bids, its median quote is 3.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Fayaz Ahmad Wani-Engineering Group, IMRAN HAKAK-AL HASSAN ASSOCIATES and SHAIR MOHD WAJAHAT-M/S SHAIR MOHAMMAD WAJAHAT. Fayaz Ahmad Wani-Engineering Group bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; Haleem Bhat-Shalimar Engineering Pvt ltd won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.