Competitor profile

GURU PRASAD MOHARANA

They win 75% of what they bid — and 92% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

4tenders on record
2buyer authorities
0states
23 May 2025last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.1 Cr
of ₹3.4 Cr bid — 92.2% conversion
Win rate
75.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count4 bids
75.0%
25.0%
Awarded375.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost125.0%
By value₹3.4 Cr
92.2%
Awarded₹3.1 Cr92.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹26.6 L7.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

3 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SIKANDAR ALAM1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹3.2 Cr
won head-to-head
02
GURUJI INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹2.9 Cr
won head-to-head
03
CIS GLOBAL INFRATECH PVT LTD0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
PRADEEP PATRA1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹3.2 Cr
won head-to-head
05
MAYA KHUSHI0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/S RAMRAJ CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGURU PRASAD awardedOthers

About GURU PRASAD MOHARANA

GURU PRASAD MOHARANA appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 75.0% win rate — worth ₹3.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 23 May 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is National Institute of Technology Rourkela, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against SIKANDAR ALAM, GURUJI INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD and CIS GLOBAL INFRATECH PVT LTD. SIKANDAR ALAM bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; GURU PRASAD MOHARANA won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.