Competitor profile

GURU KRIPA CONSTRUCTION

They win 20% of what they bid, but only 3% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

5tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
16 Jan 2026last award
Total bids
5
5 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹9.3 L
of ₹3.0 Cr bid — 3.0% conversion
Win rate
20.0%
of 5 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count5 bids
20.0%
20.0%
60.0%
Awarded120.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected120.0%
Lost360.0%
By value₹3.0 Cr
46.1%
50.8%
Awarded₹9.3 L3.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.4 Cr46.1%
Lost₹1.5 Cr50.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Rajasthan₹9.3 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s Shri Vinayak Construction0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
M/S Agarwal construction company0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M/s Mangalam Enterprises0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
₹1.0 Cr
won head-to-head
05
M/S VINAYAK ASSOCIATES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
PrakashPatel0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGURU KRIPA awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to GURU KRIPA

About GURU KRIPA CONSTRUCTION

GURU KRIPA CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 5 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 5 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 20.0% win rate — worth ₹9.3 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 16 Jan 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Amber Development Authority, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Rajasthan. On priced bids, its median quote is 14.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/s Shri Vinayak Construction, M/S Agarwal construction company and M/s Mangalam Enterprises. M/s Shri Vinayak Construction bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; GURU KRIPA CONSTRUCTION won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.