Competitor profile

M/S GURU KRIPA ASSOCIATES

They win 33% of what they bid, and 31% of the value they chase.

6tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
17 Sept 2023last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹56.1 L
of ₹1.8 Cr bid — 31.1% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count6 bids
33.3%
33.3%
33.3%
Awarded233.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected233.3%
Lost233.3%
By value₹1.8 Cr
31.1%
30.7%
38.2%
Awarded₹56.1 L31.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹55.4 L30.7%
Lost₹68.9 L38.2%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

RES - Chief Engineer₹23.8 L42.4%

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttarakhand₹56.1 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
KHUSHI RAM TOMAR1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹28.4 L
won head-to-head
02
M/SRAVINDER SING CHAUHAN0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M/S MANMOHAN SINGH0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/s Vinod Kumar Chauhan1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹30.5 L
won head-to-head
05
Kothari Associates0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/S BAHUGUNA CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGURU KRIPA awardedOthers

About M/S GURU KRIPA ASSOCIATES

M/S GURU KRIPA ASSOCIATES appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹56.1 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 17 Sept 2023.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is MD (Drinking Water) Peyjal Nigam GoUK, at 57.6% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Uttarakhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against KHUSHI RAM TOMAR, M/SRAVINDER SING CHAUHAN and M/S MANMOHAN SINGH. KHUSHI RAM TOMAR bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; M/S GURU KRIPA ASSOCIATES won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.