Competitor profile

GURMIT SINGH TUTEJA

They win 75% of what they bid, but only 38% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

4tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
30 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹20.3 L
of ₹53.3 L bid — 38.1% conversion
Win rate
75.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count4 bids
75.0%
25.0%
Awarded375.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost125.0%
By value₹53.3 L
38.1%
61.9%
Awarded₹20.3 L38.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹33.0 L61.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
DILIP PATIDAR0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Yashoda Gurjar0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
ASHISH CHAUBE0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
NARENDRA KUMAR SHARMA0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
SOURABH SETHIYA0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
VISHAL KUMAR JOSHI0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGURMIT SINGH awardedOthers

About GURMIT SINGH TUTEJA

GURMIT SINGH TUTEJA appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 75.0% win rate — worth ₹20.3 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Urban Administration and Development, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against DILIP PATIDAR, Yashoda Gurjar and ASHISH CHAUBE. DILIP PATIDAR bid on 1 of the same tender and won 0 of them; GURMIT SINGH TUTEJA won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.