Competitor profile

GUPTA ASSOCIATES

They win 75% of what they bid — and 86% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

4tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
11 Apr 2026last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹16.7 Cr
of ₹19.5 Cr bid — 85.9% conversion
Win rate
75.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count4 bids
75.0%
25.0%
Awarded375.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost125.0%
By value₹19.5 Cr
85.9%
14.1%
Awarded₹16.7 Cr85.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹2.8 Cr14.1%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Excise Department₹16.7 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Madhya Pradesh₹16.7 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SHRI SHANIDEV LIQOUR TRADERS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Maidstone Traders Private limited0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
JAI MAA KALI ASSOCIATES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
JAYNARAYAN SURYAWANSHI0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
RISHAB PATWA0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Maa Narmada Traders0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGUPTA ASSOCIATES awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to GUPTA ASSOCIATES

About GUPTA ASSOCIATES

GUPTA ASSOCIATES appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 75.0% win rate — worth ₹16.7 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 11 Apr 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Excise Department, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh.

It most often bids against SHRI SHANIDEV LIQOUR TRADERS, Maidstone Traders Private limited and JAI MAA KALI ASSOCIATES. SHRI SHANIDEV LIQOUR TRADERS bid on 1 of the same tender and won 0 of them; GUPTA ASSOCIATES won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.