Competitor profile

Gupta Agencies

They win 10% of what they bid, and 16% of the value they chase.

29tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
14 Dec 2023last award
Total bids
29
29 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
22 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹68.4 L
of ₹4.1 Cr bid — 16.5% conversion
Win rate
10.3%
of 29 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count29 bids
10.3%
13.8%
75.9%
Awarded310.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected413.8%
Lost2275.9%
By value₹4.1 Cr
16.5%
21.1%
62.4%
Awarded₹68.4 L16.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹87.4 L21.1%
Lost₹2.6 Cr62.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

HPSEBL₹68.4 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
VINAY ENTERPRISES1 win · 9 shared tenders
₹31.3 L
won head-to-head
02
Koyla Engineering Works5 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹20.3 L
won head-to-head
03
SUNEEL THAKUR ELECTRICAL0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
TILAK RAJ0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/S DEVARYA ENGINEERING2 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹17.1 L
won head-to-head
06
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGupta Agencies awardedOthers

About Gupta Agencies

Gupta Agencies appears as a bidder on 29 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 29 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 10.3% win rate — worth ₹68.4 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 14 Dec 2023.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is HPSEBL, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Himachal Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 20.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against VINAY ENTERPRISES, Koyla Engineering Works and SUNEEL THAKUR ELECTRICAL. VINAY ENTERPRISES bid on 9 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; Gupta Agencies won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.