Competitor profile

M/S GULAM RASOOL MIR

They win 50% of what they bid, and 52% of the value they chase.

2tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
20 Jun 2025last award
Total bids
2
2 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹6.5 L
of ₹12.5 L bid — 51.9% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 2 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count2 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded150.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost150.0%
By value₹12.5 L
51.9%
48.1%
Awarded₹6.5 L51.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹6.0 L48.1%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

JKSPDC₹6.5 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
MOHD ASIF NAJAR0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
02
M/S AIJAZ AHMED MIR0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M/S AB RASHID LONE0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/S IRFAN AHMAD MIR0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/S HAYAT ENTERPRISE1 win · 1 shared tender
₹4.9 L
won head-to-head
06
SAMEER AHMAD BHAT0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGULAM RASOOL awardedOthers

About M/S GULAM RASOOL MIR

M/S GULAM RASOOL MIR appears as a bidder on 2 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 2 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹6.5 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 20 Jun 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is JKSPDC, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Jammu And Kashmir. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against MOHD ASIF NAJAR, M/S AIJAZ AHMED MIR and M/S AB RASHID LONE. MOHD ASIF NAJAR bid on 1 of the same tender and won 0 of them; M/S GULAM RASOOL MIR won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.