Competitor profile

GULAB HARDWARE AND FABRICATION

They win 8% of what they bid, and 5% of the value they chase.

12tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
8 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
12
12 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
5 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹10.1 L
of ₹2.1 Cr bid — 4.7% conversion
Win rate
8.3%
of 12 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count12 bids
50.0%
41.7%
Awarded18.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected650.0%
Lost541.7%
By value₹2.1 Cr
64.1%
31.2%
Awarded₹10.1 L4.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.4 Cr64.1%
Lost₹66.6 L31.2%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Jharkhand₹10.1 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
ANAND KUMAR YADAV3 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹37.0 L
won head-to-head
02
RAKESH KUMAR SINGH1 win · 6 shared tenders
₹16.7 L
won head-to-head
03
MOHAMMAD IMRAN0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/S E M CONSTRUCTIONS0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
VISHWAKARMA ENTERPRISES0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
RAMESH KUMAR0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGULAB HARDWARE awardedOthers

About GULAB HARDWARE AND FABRICATION

GULAB HARDWARE AND FABRICATION appears as a bidder on 12 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 12 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 8.3% win rate — worth ₹10.1 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 8 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Birsa Agricultural University, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Jharkhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 5.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against ANAND KUMAR YADAV, RAKESH KUMAR SINGH and MOHAMMAD IMRAN. ANAND KUMAR YADAV bid on 6 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; GULAB HARDWARE AND FABRICATION won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.