Competitor profile

granma sign print

They win 50% of what they bid — and 90% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

2tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
21 Mar 2026last award
Total bids
2
2 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4.2 Cr
of ₹4.6 Cr bid — 90.2% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 2 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count2 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded150.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost150.0%
By value₹4.6 Cr
90.2%
Awarded₹4.2 Cr90.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹45.5 L9.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹4.2 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Lipi enterprises1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹31.1 L
won head-to-head
02
VEEVAL INDUSTRIES0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
AMAR BHARTI0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
RAMMIYA P R0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Kerala Institution For the Blind0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
ALOIS GRAPHICS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedgranma sign awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to granma sign

About granma sign print

granma sign print appears as a bidder on 2 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 2 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹4.2 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 21 Mar 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Kerala State Financial Enterprises Ltd, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is 23.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Lipi enterprises, VEEVAL INDUSTRIES and AMAR BHARTI. Lipi enterprises bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; granma sign print won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.