Competitor profile

GOVIND SINGH RAWAT

They win 31% of what they bid, and 28% of the value they chase.

13tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
25 Jun 2025last award
Total bids
13
13 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
7 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.5 Cr
of ₹8.8 Cr bid — 28.2% conversion
Win rate
30.8%
of 13 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count13 bids
30.8%
15.4%
53.8%
Awarded430.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected215.4%
Lost753.8%
By value₹8.8 Cr
28.2%
18.8%
53.0%
Awarded₹2.5 Cr28.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.7 Cr18.8%
Lost₹4.7 Cr53.0%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttarakhand₹2.5 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
AJBPG5743L5 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹4.2 Cr
won head-to-head
02
SUNIL SINGH1 win · 1 shared tender
₹53.7 L
won head-to-head
03
₹67.3 L
won head-to-head
04
RATAN SINGH RAWAT1 win · 1 shared tender
₹28.8 L
won head-to-head
05
Gaurav Singh Khatri1 win · 1 shared tender
₹40.8 L
won head-to-head
06
ANUP PRAKASH CHAUHAN1 win · 1 shared tender
₹64.9 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGOVIND SINGH awardedOthers

About GOVIND SINGH RAWAT

GOVIND SINGH RAWAT appears as a bidder on 13 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 13 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 30.8% win rate — worth ₹2.5 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 25 Jun 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is MD (Drinking Water) Peyjal Nigam GoUK, at 78.6% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Uttarakhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against AJBPG5743L, SUNIL SINGH and M/S RAMESH CHANDRA SATI CONTRACTOR CHAMOLI. AJBPG5743L bid on 8 of the same tenders and won 5 of them; GOVIND SINGH RAWAT won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.