Competitor profile

GM INFRASTRUCTURES

They win 66% of what they bid, and 62% of the value they chase.

59tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
2 Jul 2025last award
Total bids
58
59 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
38
8 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹15.1 Cr
of ₹24.3 Cr bid — 62.2% conversion
Win rate
65.5%
of 58 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count58 bids
65.5%
20.7%
13.8%
Awarded3865.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected1220.7%
Lost813.8%
By value₹24.3 Cr
62.2%
19.0%
18.8%
Awarded₹15.1 Cr62.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹4.6 Cr19.0%
Lost₹4.6 Cr18.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttarakhand₹15.1 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
BHAWNA BORWELL AND ENGINEERS6 wins · 23 shared tenders
₹2.4 Cr
won head-to-head
02
BIHARI LAL SAH4 wins · 22 shared tenders
₹1.6 Cr
won head-to-head
03
shyam engineers4 wins · 16 shared tenders
₹1.8 Cr
won head-to-head
04
AKBAR ALI9 wins · 14 shared tenders
₹3.5 Cr
won head-to-head
05
M/S PARVATIYA ENGG. WORKS1 win · 14 shared tenders
₹47.7 L
won head-to-head
06
H N SINGH AND COMPANY2 wins · 13 shared tenders
₹63.0 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGM INFRASTRUCTURES awardedOthers

About GM INFRASTRUCTURES

GM INFRASTRUCTURES appears as a bidder on 59 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 58 decided bids, it was awarded 38 — a 65.5% win rate — worth ₹15.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 2 Jul 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is MD (Drinking Water) Peyjal Nigam GoUK, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Uttarakhand. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against BHAWNA BORWELL AND ENGINEERS, BIHARI LAL SAH and shyam engineers. BHAWNA BORWELL AND ENGINEERS bid on 23 of the same tenders and won 6 of them; GM INFRASTRUCTURES won 12.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.