Competitor profile

GITANJALI PADHAN

They win 7% of what they bid, and 6% of the value they chase.

257tenders on record
10buyer authorities
1state
6 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
252
257 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
17
216 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹9.5 Cr
of ₹146.2 Cr bid — 6.5% conversion
Win rate
6.8%
of 252 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count252 bids
85.7%
Awarded176.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected197.5%
Lost21685.7%
By value₹146.2 Cr
87.5%
Awarded₹9.5 Cr6.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹8.8 Cr6.0%
Lost₹128.0 Cr87.5%

Where they win

5 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

CE RW I₹2.5 Cr26.9%
EIC-CIVIL₹1.3 Cr14.2%

Operating states

LowHigh
Odisha₹9.5 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
ROHAN KUMAR NAG0 wins · 106 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Bhawani Sankar Harpal2 wins · 101 shared tenders
₹2.7 Cr
won head-to-head
03
CH SUBASH CHANDRA PATRO4 wins · 97 shared tenders
₹1.7 Cr
won head-to-head
04
ABHINANDAN PANDA0 wins · 80 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
PRASANNA SETHI3 wins · 77 shared tenders
₹1.2 Cr
won head-to-head
06
Jitendra Kumar Naik1 win · 73 shared tenders
₹38.0 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGITANJALI PADHAN awardedOthers

About GITANJALI PADHAN

GITANJALI PADHAN appears as a bidder on 257 government tenders on record, from 10 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 252 decided bids, it was awarded 17 — a 6.8% win rate — worth ₹9.5 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 6 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is CE,Minor Irrigation,BBSR, at 33.0% of what it has won, out of 5 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Odisha. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against ROHAN KUMAR NAG, Bhawani Sankar Harpal and CH SUBASH CHANDRA PATRO. ROHAN KUMAR NAG bid on 106 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; GITANJALI PADHAN won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.