Competitor profile

GIGMAT PALJOR

They win 18% of what they bid, and 21% of the value they chase.

28tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
24 Jun 2025last award
Total bids
28
28 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
22 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹92.7 L
of ₹4.5 Cr bid — 20.8% conversion
Win rate
17.9%
of 28 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count28 bids
17.9%
78.6%
Awarded517.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected13.6%
Lost2278.6%
By value₹4.5 Cr
20.8%
21.9%
57.3%
Awarded₹92.7 L20.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹97.8 L21.9%
Lost₹2.6 Cr57.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Ladakh₹92.7 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S TUNDUP YANGJOR2 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹39.3 L
won head-to-head
02
M/S STANZIN LOTUS GOVT CONTRACTOR1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹10.5 L
won head-to-head
03
M/S NEMA LOTUS0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/S DORJAY NAMGIAL GOVT CONTRACTOR0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Rigzin Chosjor0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/S DELDAN NAMGYAL0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGIGMAT PALJOR awardedOthers

About GIGMAT PALJOR

GIGMAT PALJOR appears as a bidder on 28 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 28 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 17.9% win rate — worth ₹92.7 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 24 Jun 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Rural Development and Panchayati Raj, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Ladakh. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against M/S TUNDUP YANGJOR, M/S STANZIN LOTUS GOVT CONTRACTOR and M/S NEMA LOTUS. M/S TUNDUP YANGJOR bid on 6 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; GIGMAT PALJOR won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.