Competitor profile

GHULAM NABI MIR

They win 11% of what they bid — and 26% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

38tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
14 Aug 2024last award
Total bids
35
38 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
30 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.2 Cr
of ₹4.5 Cr bid — 26.3% conversion
Win rate
11.4%
of 35 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count35 bids
11.4%
85.7%
Awarded411.4%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected12.9%
Lost3085.7%
By value₹4.5 Cr
26.3%
70.4%
Awarded₹1.2 Cr26.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹14.7 L3.3%
Lost₹3.2 Cr70.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Tourism₹1.2 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Manohar Singh Sasan7 wins · 34 shared tenders
₹40.9 L
won head-to-head
02
M/S GURNAM SINGH10 wins · 32 shared tenders
₹99.4 L
won head-to-head
03
Javid Iqbal1 win · 30 shared tenders
₹3.8 L
won head-to-head
04
Saahil Mir0 wins · 13 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
AYAZ ALI KHAN2 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹15.5 L
won head-to-head
06
AZMAT HUSSAIN SHAH1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹10.4 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGHULAM NABI awardedOthers

About GHULAM NABI MIR

GHULAM NABI MIR appears as a bidder on 38 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 35 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 11.4% win rate — worth ₹1.2 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 14 Aug 2024.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Tourism, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Jammu And Kashmir. On priced bids, its median quote is 18.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Manohar Singh Sasan, M/S GURNAM SINGH and Javid Iqbal. Manohar Singh Sasan bid on 34 of the same tenders and won 7 of them; GHULAM NABI MIR won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.