Competitor profile

M/S GHULAM NABI

They win 17% of what they bid, and 9% of the value they chase.

12tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
20 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
12
12 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
8 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹19.5 L
of ₹2.1 Cr bid — 9.4% conversion
Win rate
16.7%
of 12 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count12 bids
16.7%
16.7%
66.7%
Awarded216.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected216.7%
Lost866.7%
By value₹2.1 Cr
18.3%
72.4%
Awarded₹19.5 L9.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹37.9 L18.3%
Lost₹1.5 Cr72.4%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Ladakh₹19.5 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
STANZIN TUNDUP2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹49.1 L
won head-to-head
02
M/S TSEWANG NAMGAIL GOVT CONTRACTOR0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M/S SONAM RIGZEN GOVT CONTRACTOR0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/S TUNDUP ANGCHUK0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/S TSERING ANGDUS0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/S RIGZEN PALJOR GOVT CONTRACTOR0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGHULAM NABI awardedOthers

About M/S GHULAM NABI

M/S GHULAM NABI appears as a bidder on 12 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 12 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 16.7% win rate — worth ₹19.5 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 20 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Animal/Sheep Husbandry, at 69.8% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Ladakh. On priced bids, its median quote is 8.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against STANZIN TUNDUP, M/S TSEWANG NAMGAIL GOVT CONTRACTOR and M/S SONAM RIGZEN GOVT CONTRACTOR. STANZIN TUNDUP bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; M/S GHULAM NABI won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.