Competitor profile

M/s GHULAM NABI HAJAM

They win 38% of what they bid, and 34% of the value they chase.

30tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
21 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
26
30 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
10
15 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.7 Cr
of ₹5.1 Cr bid — 33.7% conversion
Win rate
38.5%
of 26 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count26 bids
38.5%
57.7%
Awarded1038.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected13.8%
Lost1557.7%
By value₹5.1 Cr
33.7%
63.5%
Awarded₹1.7 Cr33.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹14.2 L2.8%
Lost₹3.2 Cr63.5%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

10 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S M.Y Enterprises0 wins · 18 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
M/s Bashir Enterprises1 win · 17 shared tenders
₹15.3 L
won head-to-head
03
M/s Nasir Rasool Dar4 wins · 16 shared tenders
₹66.5 L
won head-to-head
04
M/s Jaipal Associates1 win · 14 shared tenders
₹13.0 L
won head-to-head
05
M/S GHULAM HASSAN KUCHAY0 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/S Noor Mohammad Shalla0 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGHULAM NABI awardedOthers

About M/s GHULAM NABI HAJAM

M/s GHULAM NABI HAJAM appears as a bidder on 30 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 26 decided bids, it was awarded 10 — a 38.5% win rate — worth ₹1.7 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 21 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 3.9% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S M.Y Enterprises, M/s Bashir Enterprises and M/s Nasir Rasool Dar. M/S M.Y Enterprises bid on 18 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; M/s GHULAM NABI HAJAM won 9.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.