Competitor profile

M/S GHULAM MOHAMMAD CHATAPA

They win 16% of what they bid, and 10% of the value they chase.

58tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
14 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
57
58 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
9
42 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.1 Cr
of ₹20.5 Cr bid — 10.5% conversion
Win rate
15.8%
of 57 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count57 bids
15.8%
10.5%
73.7%
Awarded915.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected610.5%
Lost4273.7%
By value₹20.5 Cr
10.5%
81.2%
Awarded₹2.1 Cr10.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.7 Cr8.3%
Lost₹16.6 Cr81.2%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

9 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
MS SHOWKAT ALIJOO4 wins · 49 shared tenders
₹1.0 Cr
won head-to-head
02
MEHDI ALI7 wins · 44 shared tenders
₹2.2 Cr
won head-to-head
03
M/S MOHD MUSSA9 wins · 43 shared tenders
₹2.6 Cr
won head-to-head
04
M/S INDUS HIMALAYAN EXPLORERS4 wins · 30 shared tenders
₹41.9 L
won head-to-head
05
M/S HONY CAPT RIGZIN SAMPHEL1 win · 17 shared tenders
₹25.7 L
won head-to-head
06
M/S SHAMSHER ALI SUFI5 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹1.5 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGHULAM MOHAMMAD awardedOthers

About M/S GHULAM MOHAMMAD CHATAPA

M/S GHULAM MOHAMMAD CHATAPA appears as a bidder on 58 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 57 decided bids, it was awarded 9 — a 15.8% win rate — worth ₹2.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 14 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 22.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against MS SHOWKAT ALIJOO, MEHDI ALI and M/S MOHD MUSSA. MS SHOWKAT ALIJOO bid on 49 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; M/S GHULAM MOHAMMAD CHATAPA won 8.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.