Competitor profile

George Kutty

They win 38% of what they bid, but only 14% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

37tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
29 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
37
37 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
14
21 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹72.4 L
of ₹5.1 Cr bid — 14.2% conversion
Win rate
37.8%
of 37 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count37 bids
37.8%
56.8%
Awarded1437.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected25.4%
Lost2156.8%
By value₹5.1 Cr
14.2%
79.7%
Awarded₹72.4 L14.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹30.8 L6.1%
Lost₹4.1 Cr79.7%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Irrigation Department₹67.6 L93.5%

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹72.4 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
V. JOY0 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
CHARLES TOM2 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹37.4 L
won head-to-head
03
K.T. DEVASIA2 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹11.3 L
won head-to-head
04
MUHAMMED ALSIFE K.S0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
ANIL V VARGHESE1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹19.1 L
won head-to-head
06
MUHAMMED SABITH K S1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹3.2 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGeorge Kutty awardedOthers

About George Kutty

George Kutty appears as a bidder on 37 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 37 decided bids, it was awarded 14 — a 37.8% win rate — worth ₹72.4 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 29 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Irrigation Department, at 93.5% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is 6.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against V. JOY, CHARLES TOM and K.T. DEVASIA. V. JOY bid on 9 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; George Kutty won 7.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.