Competitor profile

Gautam Services

They win 50% of what they bid — and 80% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

2tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
1 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
2
2 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹6.7 L
of ₹8.3 L bid — 80.2% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 2 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count2 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded150.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost150.0%
By value₹8.3 L
80.2%
19.8%
Awarded₹6.7 L80.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹1.6 L19.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttarakhand₹6.7 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SHIV ENTERPRISES1 win · 1 shared tender
₹9,765
won head-to-head
02
₹0
won head-to-head
03
pratap kanwal0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
HIMALAYAN HOUSE KEEPING SERVICES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
GOOD HOUSE KEEPING0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Alliance Security Services0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGautam Services awardedOthers

About Gautam Services

Gautam Services appears as a bidder on 2 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 2 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹6.7 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Principal Soban Singh Jeena Government Institute of Medical Science and Research Almora, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Uttarakhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 792.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SHIV ENTERPRISES, Rohit Godiyal house keeping Contractor and pratap kanwal. SHIV ENTERPRISES bid on 1 of the same tender and won 1 of them; Gautam Services won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.