Competitor profile

GARIMA ASSOCIATES

They win 33% of what they bid — and 59% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

3tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
24 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
3
3 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹6.4 L
of ₹10.8 L bid — 58.9% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count3 bids
33.3%
66.7%
Awarded133.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost266.7%
By value₹10.8 L
58.9%
41.1%
Awarded₹6.4 L58.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹4.4 L41.1%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Rural Engineering Service₹6.4 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Madhya Pradesh₹6.4 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
JAI MATA DI ASSOCIATE0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
02
M/S ANANYA CONTRUCTION0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
SIDHI VINAYAK CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
ASHISH THAKUR0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
MANISH KUMAR JAIN CONTRACTOR0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
A.S.ASSOCIATE1 win · 1 shared tender
₹2.0 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGARIMA ASSOCIATES awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to GARIMA ASSOCIATES

About GARIMA ASSOCIATES

GARIMA ASSOCIATES appears as a bidder on 3 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹6.4 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 24 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Rural Engineering Service, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 10.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against JAI MATA DI ASSOCIATE, M/S ANANYA CONTRUCTION and SIDHI VINAYAK CONSTRUCTION. JAI MATA DI ASSOCIATE bid on 1 of the same tender and won 0 of them; GARIMA ASSOCIATES won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.