Competitor profile

M/S GARDEN AGRO SERVICES

They win 67% of what they bid — and 83% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

3tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
22 May 2026last award
Total bids
3
3 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹51.6 L
of ₹62.1 L bid — 83.1% conversion
Win rate
66.7%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count3 bids
66.7%
33.3%
Awarded266.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected133.3%
Lost00.0%
By value₹62.1 L
83.1%
16.9%
Awarded₹51.6 L83.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹10.5 L16.9%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

RSMML₹51.6 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Rajasthan₹51.6 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
ORCHID VALLEY1 win · 1 shared tender
₹62
won head-to-head
02
M/S DYNA FLUENCE INFRA0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
SAGAR GREENS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Chhavi Nursery0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Unique Garden Solutions0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGARDEN AGRO awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to GARDEN AGRO

About M/S GARDEN AGRO SERVICES

M/S GARDEN AGRO SERVICES appears as a bidder on 3 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 66.7% win rate — worth ₹51.6 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 22 May 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is RSMML, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Rajasthan. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against ORCHID VALLEY, M/S DYNA FLUENCE INFRA and SAGAR GREENS. ORCHID VALLEY bid on 1 of the same tender and won 1 of them; M/S GARDEN AGRO SERVICES won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.