Competitor profile

GANADOOT SOCIAL WELFARE CENTRE

They win 80% of what they bid, but only 53% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

5tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
4 Jul 2025last award
Total bids
5
5 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹73.1 L
of ₹1.4 Cr bid — 52.8% conversion
Win rate
80.0%
of 5 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count5 bids
80.0%
20.0%
Awarded480.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected120.0%
Lost00.0%
By value₹1.4 Cr
52.8%
47.2%
Awarded₹73.1 L52.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹65.4 L47.2%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Tripura₹73.1 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Valeur Fabtex Private Limited1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹5.3 L
won head-to-head
02
RIGPA EDUSOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹20.0 L
won head-to-head
03
Indianeers Media Private Limited1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹13.4 L
won head-to-head
04
₹0
won head-to-head
05
₹0
won head-to-head
06
ASCENSIVE EDUCARE PRIVATE LIMITED0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGANADOOT SOCIAL awardedOthers

About GANADOOT SOCIAL WELFARE CENTRE

GANADOOT SOCIAL WELFARE CENTRE appears as a bidder on 5 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 5 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 80.0% win rate — worth ₹73.1 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 4 Jul 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate of Tribal Rehab in Plantation and Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Group, at 100.0% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Tripura. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Valeur Fabtex Private Limited, RIGPA EDUSOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED and Indianeers Media Private Limited. Valeur Fabtex Private Limited bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; GANADOOT SOCIAL WELFARE CENTRE won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.