Competitor profile

GAJENDRA PADHAN

They win 5% of what they bid, and 5% of the value they chase.

37tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
29 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
37
37 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
35 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹15.0 L
of ₹2.8 Cr bid — 5.4% conversion
Win rate
5.4%
of 37 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count37 bids
94.6%
Awarded25.4%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost3594.6%
By value₹2.8 Cr
94.6%
Awarded₹15.0 L5.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹2.7 Cr94.6%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

CE RW I₹15.0 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Odisha₹15.0 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Uma Bhoi2 wins · 28 shared tenders
₹8.7 L
won head-to-head
02
KOMAL AGRAWALA0 wins · 26 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
UPENDRA SETHI3 wins · 26 shared tenders
₹21.2 L
won head-to-head
04
KALYANI NANDA0 wins · 21 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Namita Mishra1 win · 21 shared tenders
₹8.4 L
won head-to-head
06
REETANJALI PRADHAN1 win · 20 shared tenders
₹4.2 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGAJENDRA PADHAN awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to GAJENDRA PADHAN

About GAJENDRA PADHAN

GAJENDRA PADHAN appears as a bidder on 37 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 37 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 5.4% win rate — worth ₹15.0 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 29 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is CE RW I, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Odisha. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Uma Bhoi, KOMAL AGRAWALA and UPENDRA SETHI. Uma Bhoi bid on 28 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; GAJENDRA PADHAN won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.