Competitor profile

G.M. ENGINEERING SERVICES

They win 4% of what they bid, and 2% of the value they chase.

71tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
3 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
68
71 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
62 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹34.6 L
of ₹16.3 Cr bid — 2.1% conversion
Win rate
4.4%
of 68 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count68 bids
91.2%
Awarded34.4%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected34.4%
Lost6291.2%
By value₹16.3 Cr
93.4%
Awarded₹34.6 L2.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹72.2 L4.4%
Lost₹15.2 Cr93.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

3 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
dinesh enterprises11 wins · 20 shared tenders
₹1.5 Cr
won head-to-head
02
Malpotra Enterprises0 wins · 16 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Ms International Engineers1 win · 14 shared tenders
₹25.4 L
won head-to-head
04
satpal and brothers5 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹76.2 L
won head-to-head
05
Ashoka Engineers0 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
JAI DURGA CONSTRUCTION CO1 win · 11 shared tenders
₹11.1 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedG.M. ENGINEERING awardedOthers

About G.M. ENGINEERING SERVICES

G.M. ENGINEERING SERVICES appears as a bidder on 71 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 68 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 4.4% win rate — worth ₹34.6 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 3 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 15.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against dinesh enterprises, Malpotra Enterprises and Ms International Engineers. dinesh enterprises bid on 20 of the same tenders and won 11 of them; G.M. ENGINEERING SERVICES won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.