Competitor profile

M/S FULENDRA NAG

They win 13% of what they bid, and 15% of the value they chase.

8tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
26 Jun 2025last award
Total bids
8
8 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
6 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.5 Cr
of ₹16.2 Cr bid — 15.4% conversion
Win rate
12.5%
of 8 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count8 bids
12.5%
12.5%
75.0%
Awarded112.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected112.5%
Lost675.0%
By value₹16.2 Cr
15.4%
11.2%
73.4%
Awarded₹2.5 Cr15.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.8 Cr11.2%
Lost₹11.9 Cr73.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

RWD EinC₹2.5 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Jharkhand₹2.5 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Dynamic Constructions2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹4.1 Cr
won head-to-head
02
Md Yusuf Khan1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹2.4 Cr
won head-to-head
03
M/s Suriya Eng. Construction1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹2.2 Cr
won head-to-head
04
Budheshwar Gope0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
R. N. Bhagat and Co.0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
RIDHI ENGICON PRIVATE LIMITED0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedFULENDRA NAG awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to FULENDRA NAG

About M/S FULENDRA NAG

M/S FULENDRA NAG appears as a bidder on 8 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 8 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 12.5% win rate — worth ₹2.5 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 26 Jun 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is RWD EinC, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Jharkhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 4.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Dynamic Constructions, Md Yusuf Khan and M/s Suriya Eng. Construction. Dynamic Constructions bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; M/S FULENDRA NAG won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.