Competitor profile

FRANKLIN IME TECHS PVT LTD

They win 35% of what they bid — and 73% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

17tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
20 Dec 2019last award
Total bids
17
17 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
6
11 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹6.2 Cr
of ₹8.5 Cr bid — 72.6% conversion
Win rate
35.3%
of 17 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count17 bids
35.3%
64.7%
Awarded635.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost1164.7%
By value₹8.5 Cr
72.6%
27.4%
Awarded₹6.2 Cr72.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹2.3 Cr27.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

CPCL,DGM(M and C)₹6.2 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

6 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
DIVYA ENGINEERING WORKS0 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
DR Enterprises5 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹91.3 L
won head-to-head
03
Vishal testing and services0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Sri Ganapathy Enterprises0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Sri Sarvamangala Fabrication2 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹28.9 L
won head-to-head
06
A.C.P.Electrical Engineering1 win · 6 shared tenders
₹51.2 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedFRANKLIN IME awardedOthers

About FRANKLIN IME TECHS PVT LTD

FRANKLIN IME TECHS PVT LTD appears as a bidder on 17 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 17 decided bids, it was awarded 6 — a 35.3% win rate — worth ₹6.2 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 20 Dec 2019.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is CPCL,DGM(M and C), at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 23.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against DIVYA ENGINEERING WORKS, DR Enterprises and Vishal testing and services. DIVYA ENGINEERING WORKS bid on 10 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; FRANKLIN IME TECHS PVT LTD won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.