Competitor profile

FAASIL K M

They win 45% of what they bid, and 49% of the value they chase.

11tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
25 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
11
11 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
6 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹22.7 L
of ₹46.2 L bid — 49.1% conversion
Win rate
45.5%
of 11 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count11 bids
45.5%
54.5%
Awarded545.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost654.5%
By value₹46.2 L
49.1%
50.9%
Awarded₹22.7 L49.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹23.5 L50.9%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹22.7 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
KHALANDER SHAFI B4 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹16.8 L
won head-to-head
02
P.MOHAMMED HANIEF0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
MRSCO BUILDERS PVT LTD2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹6.3 L
won head-to-head
04
ABOOBACKER SIDDIK S U0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Aboobacker Siddeeque A M0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedFAASIL K M awardedOthers

About FAASIL K M

FAASIL K M appears as a bidder on 11 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 11 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 45.5% win rate — worth ₹22.7 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 25 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Local Self Government Department, at 67.0% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against KHALANDER SHAFI B, P.MOHAMMED HANIEF and MRSCO BUILDERS PVT LTD. KHALANDER SHAFI B bid on 8 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; FAASIL K M won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.