Competitor profile

M/S F I CONSTRUCTION

They win 22% of what they bid, and 16% of the value they chase.

19tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
31 Dec 2025last award
Total bids
18
19 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
9 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹46.7 Cr
of ₹298.9 Cr bid — 15.6% conversion
Win rate
22.2%
of 18 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count18 bids
22.2%
27.8%
50.0%
Awarded422.2%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected527.8%
Lost950.0%
By value₹298.9 Cr
15.6%
43.7%
40.6%
Awarded₹46.7 Cr15.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹130.7 Cr43.7%
Lost₹121.4 Cr40.6%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

4 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Mohd Yousuf Shan0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
RATTAN CHAND AND SONS0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Abdul Quyoom Shan2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹21.3 Cr
won head-to-head
04
M/S JAVED IQBAL WANI1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹21.7 Cr
won head-to-head
05
MS MIR FABRICATORS AND ENGINEERS1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹16.0 Cr
won head-to-head
06
₹30.9 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedF I CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

About M/S F I CONSTRUCTION

M/S F I CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 19 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 18 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 22.2% win rate — worth ₹46.7 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 31 Dec 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PMGSY Jammu and CE PW (R and B) Jammu, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 5.7% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Mohd Yousuf Shan, RATTAN CHAND AND SONS and Abdul Quyoom Shan. Mohd Yousuf Shan bid on 7 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; M/S F I CONSTRUCTION won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.